Skip to content
AES / Anderson Efficiency
Specialist
Menu

Denver / Efficiency consulting

Make room for
clearer thinking.

Anderson Efficiency Specialist (AES) explores evaluation, process optimization and technology integration. Start with the work itself: what happens, what gets in the way, and what needs a closer look.

Explore the Blog
01 / Evaluation

Observe

Where does work pause? Describe the task and the information available at that point.

Discuss

Consider the difference between a visible delay and an explanation for it. Each deserves its own question.

Clarify

What would help establish whether the difficulty is repeated or occasional?

02 / Processes

Observe

Look at the handoff. What arrives, what must be decided, and what does the next person need?

Discuss

A process is more than a list of tasks. It also includes the connections between them: requests, decisions, approvals and the information that makes each step possible.

When the same question returns, consider whether a step is unclear, whether information arrives late, or whether different people understand the task differently. These are possibilities to examine, not conclusions about a particular organization.

Clarify

Which step needs a better description before a change can be discussed? Name the uncertainty and keep it visible.

03 / Technology

Observe

Identify the work a tool would support before listing the features it could provide.

Discuss

Think about the relationship between people, information and software. A tool belongs within that wider context.

Clarify

What would make a proposed tool suitable for the way the work is actually done?

Start with an observation

A bottleneck is a question
before it is an answer.

A delay can be easy to notice and difficult to explain. Work might wait for a decision, return for missing information, or pass through a step whose purpose is not clear to everyone involved. The visible pause provides a starting point; it does not, by itself, identify the cause.

Describe what happened in plain language. Keep the task, the handoff and the information together in that description. Then distinguish what was observed from what people think might explain it. This gives a discussion a shared reference and makes differences in understanding easier to see.

The AES overview places evaluation and analysis alongside process optimization. Read together, these subjects point toward understanding a process before considering changes to it. A useful discussion can stay specific: which step is difficult to complete, what is needed to complete it, and what evidence would clarify the situation? For a related communication topic, read “STOP cc’ing me! How to properly use Email.”

Keep the distinction visible

Assumptions & evidence

An assumption to examine

“This step is unnecessary” proposes an explanation. Ask what purpose the step serves, who relies on it, and what might be missing from the current description.

Evidence to look for

A record of the work, a specific example, or an account of a handoff can help ground the discussion. Explore Importance of Good Sampling and Representative Sampling for related reading topics.

Technology fit

Give the tool a clear purpose.

  1. 01

    What task needs support, and what information does it use?

  2. 02

    Who needs to understand the tool, and where does responsibility sit?

  3. 03

    How would it connect with the steps before and after it?

Questions & answers

A closer look at efficiency.

What is Anderson Efficiency Specialist?

Anderson Efficiency Specialist, or AES, is associated with efficiency consulting in Denver. The site introduces evaluation and analysis, process optimization, and technology integration. Its reading sections also explore questions about evidence, communication, and everyday business practices, offering starting points for understanding how work is organized.

What does an efficiency evaluation consider?

An evaluation considers how work moves through a process and where unnecessary effort may arise. The AES overview describes looking for inefficiencies, redundancies, and bottlenecks. Useful questions concern handoffs, repeated tasks, missing information, and the evidence needed to understand a problem before choosing a response.

How is process optimization different from working faster?

Process optimization concerns the arrangement of work, including its steps and handoffs. Working faster within an unclear process can leave the original difficulty untouched. Looking at why a task exists, what it depends on, and what the next person needs creates a more useful discussion of efficiency.

Why separate an assumption from an observation?

An observation describes something that can be checked, while an assumption offers a possible explanation. Keeping them separate makes it easier to see what is known and what still needs investigation. A repeated request might be observable; its cause should remain a question until the available evidence supports it.

Where does technology fit into efficiency consulting?

Technology integration is one of the areas described in the AES overview. The relevant question is how a tool supports the work: what information it handles, who uses it, and how it connects with existing steps. Defining those needs gives a software discussion a clearer purpose.

Can communication be part of an efficiency discussion?

Yes. Communication affects what people know, which decisions they can make, and how often work returns for clarification. The AES article about using email offers a related reading route. A practical starting question is whether a message gives its recipients a clear reason to read or respond.

Where can I explore the site’s topics?

The Blog and Other sections are available in the navigation, alongside named categories such as Representative Sampling and Importance of Good Sampling. Use a category to browse its related material, or open the email article linked above for a specific discussion of communication and work.

How should I use the questions on this page?

Use these questions to organize a conversation about work rather than to predict a result. Start with a concrete observation, distinguish it from a possible explanation, and identify what remains uncertain. The aim is a clearer description of the issue before discussing changes to processes or tools.